Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Sustainability is destroying the Earth [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,871 posts)28. You can't just take energy from something in a different orbit
There aren't any physical forces you can just conjure into existence to do so. You'd have to move the asteroid here, and that needs even more energy. In any form of reaction rocket, nearly all the energy ends up in the propellant, not the object. That energy, whether it comes from solar power or nuclear, would be better used directly on earth.
The energy asteroids have might be handy if you want to go beyond them, and you can use some material from them in whatever mission you're planning. If there is some material out there that is unobtainable on Earth - then, if it's amazingly useful, it might be worth the immense effort to bring it back. But there's no reason to believe there's a magic solution to pollution sitting out there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, my heart goes out to them but at the same time I have no special knowledge or access and
haikugal
May 2016
#4
Why, then, suggest a project requiring orders of magnitude more energy than our current lifestyle?
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#13
The OP suggests that our current lifestyle, and ordinary remedies are unsustainable.
immoderate
May 2016
#15
Are you saying that you don't understand what's so hard about space travel?
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#16
A moment ago you wanted to expend energy in bringing water and raw materials from off earth
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#18
And the point is you have to expend energy to bring asteroids to earth
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#38
It's a reversible process. If you think of what you'd have to do to leave an earth orbit
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#41
OK, I think you've finally conceded that mining asteroids is an energy sink
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#43
I think I heard them suggested on a TV documentary about 35 years ago
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#47
Whereas your scheme for towing and mining asteroids would be done by a cooperative
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#49
Why should I pay a utility company to beam down microwaves to maintain EMF on a grid,
immoderate
May 2016
#55
Ordinary remedies are unsustainable, and extraordinary remedies are unachievable.
GliderGuider
May 2016
#31
OK. So the world will collapse in 30 years, then the population will double in 80?
immoderate
May 2016
#34
