Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,518 posts)
7. It would be easier to simply quit fossil fuels.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:45 PM
Jun 2016

Especially in Iceland, where most homes and businesses are already heated by geothermal energy and electric power is mostly hydroelectric and geothermal.

Plans for Iceland to switch 100% to non-carbon and carbon-neutral energy sources are utterly realistic, especially with improvements in electric transportation systems and synthetic fuels.

Rock that's useful for carbon sequestration might be even more useful in the manufacture of carbon neutral concretes, maybe even concretes that absorb more atmospheric carbon dioxide as they cure than was emitted producing them.

Quitting fossils fuels is like quitting cigarettes. You have to quit buying cigarettes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»CO2 turned into stone in ...»Reply #7