Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,282 posts)
11. The million-dollar question: does it scale well?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:35 PM
Jun 2016

How much carbon can these rocks absorb per year at max carbon sequestration rates, assuming we go full-bore into exploiting them?

How much carbon can these deposits ultimately hold before they are saturated?

Because bear in mind we're currently emitting something like 30 BILLION tons of carbon per year. Just to halt atmospheric carbon at current levels, we need to scale this technique up to sequester this much carbon annually. To get back down to a safe 350 ppm CO2 before positive feedback loops kick in and make global warming irreversible for tens of thousands of years, we'd need to sequester HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of tons of CO2 per year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»CO2 turned into stone in ...»Reply #11