Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freethought

(2,461 posts)
6. Has anyone read this thread?
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 07:11 PM
Mar 2012

Last edited Sun Mar 25, 2012, 01:46 PM - Edit history (1)

Nuclear fusion simulation shows high-gain energy output


I know it's only a simulation programed onto computers. I am also aware that it could fail miserably if brought to a real world test.
However, I read article after article, here and elsewhere that seem to indicate these small incremental steps that seem to be taking us closer and closer to making fusion energy viable. I'm no physicist or an engineer but I do believe if you want to accomplish something quite difficult you don't accomplish it by doing nothing. I am hoping that they can still get funding. I am gonna keep fingers crossed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not the brightest bulb here but this sounds great!!! lostnote12 Mar 2012 #1
Every step toward fusion is priceless. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #2
Is hydrogen from water natural? OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #3
The real question: is photosynthesis without sunlight natural? napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #7
So, if we use sunlight to split water into hydrogen and oxygen OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #9
Oh yeah, hydrogen fuel cells from solar makes perfect sense. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #10
and the immune system makes hydrogen peroxide to attack invaders bananas Mar 2012 #16
Nice breakdown/thanks..... lostnote12 Mar 2012 #4
Yeah, its really the ultimate source of energy. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #8
This may or may not be true OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #13
Just to be pedantic.... Dead_Parrot Mar 2012 #11
Alright, you build that "big bang" turbine and I will eat my hat... napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #12
Well, although it was raised humorously OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #14
We could make some money off it... napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #15
Seriously though OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #19
My heuristic is simpler for identifying energy sources. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2012 #28
Some say Joe is seen daily OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #29
vacuum energy nt bananas Mar 2012 #17
NIF has something to do with FogerRox Mar 2012 #5
Unfortunately.... PamW Mar 2012 #18
Some calculations, like Todd Riders work, FogerRox Mar 2012 #30
Has anyone read this thread? freethought Mar 2012 #6
I have OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #21
At this point solutions that can't be localized aren't helpful. GliderGuider Mar 2012 #20
I don’t see that… OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #22
I know you don't. GliderGuider Mar 2012 #23
I also feel that decentralized power is useful OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #24
The underlying assumption of your position GliderGuider Mar 2012 #25
I’m hoping to avoid (or soften) the blow of that change OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #26
Me too. GliderGuider Mar 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»National Ignition Facilit...»Reply #6