Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Boomer

(4,417 posts)
3. You were right the first time
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 12:48 PM
Sep 2016

Those "surveys" are nothing more than fund-raising bait and I wouldn't take the list of priorities listed there as significant in any way. Your answers are not driving party priorities or policies; your answers are supposed to make you feel "involved" and thus more willing to donate money. It's just routine human engineering tactics used by PR designers.

As for how much of a priority it is for the party, the topic is often mentioned in speeches and raises a furrowed brow on the face of politicians who will willingly and publically confirm their belief in climate change. Is that enough for any kind of meaningful action in the face of rapidly escalating climate conditions? Not even close.

We don't have a government that can respond appropriately to such a difficult, complex and far-reaching issue. It would basically take an absolute dictator to force the necessary actions just to properly prepare for what is coming, much less to stop climate change (if that were possible, which is not likely at this point). We live in a representative democracy and that means that unpalatable actions are simply not going to get support from enough legislators to move forward.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Is Climate Change a Democ...»Reply #3