Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

OKIsItJustMe

(21,905 posts)

2. That would be inefficient

Reply to msongs (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 10:08 PM

Dec 2016

If producing fuel is the goal, it would be better to simply process the food.

However, if you already have sewage you would like to do something with…

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fuel from sewage is the future and it's closer than you think [View all] OKIsItJustMe Dec 2016 OP

coming soon, for profit toilet prisons where people are force fed to produce.... nt msongs Dec 2016 #1

That would be inefficient OKIsItJustMe Dec 2016 #2

Something like this ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2016 #4

In that case, they should hook up the new White House directly to a refinery. Laffy Kat Dec 2016 #3

Human sewage ? Hell, livestock sewage ! eppur_se_muova Dec 2016 #5

The reformation of sewage sludge has been a topic of investigation for decades. It can never be... NNadir Dec 2016 #6