Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. That isn't necessarily the case
Mon Jan 16, 2017, 10:13 PM
Jan 2017

Jiggle your thinking a bit and reorient your viewpoint from where we have been to where we are going. For proper appreciation of the available technologies it's necessary to look at the provision of power as an endeavor starting at the end user's location with the resources that are most suitable to the task of creating island-able microgrids.
Pumped hydro storage will certainly play an important role, but the role of "behind the meter" energy production, treatment and storage are the key to lowering costs.
With that in mind the role of end use energy efficiency, stationary batteries, and various thermal storage technologies for buildings, will determine the ultimate structure of our future grid.
I guess I'm saying total system costs will leave pumped hydro with a smaller role than it's comparative costs among storage options might lead one to believe.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nothing can compete with ...»Reply #3