Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

OKIsItJustMe

(21,877 posts)

4. I think "cold fusion" might be more likely

Reply to Progressive dog (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 13, 2017, 07:48 PM

Feb 2017

This is not my considered opinion, merely a knee-jerk reaction…

…

All the projects are highly imaginative – and extremely costly. The fact that they are even being considered reveals just how desperately worried researchers have become about the Arctic. “The situation is causing grave concern,” says Professor Julienne Stroeve, of University College London. “It is now much more dire than even our worst case scenarios originally suggested.’

…

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could a 400bn plan to refreeze the Arctic before the ice melts really work? [View all] NickB79 Feb 2017 OP

About as well as cold fusion NT Progressive dog Feb 2017 #1

I think "cold fusion" might be more likely OKIsItJustMe Feb 2017 #4

Well Now - That's Rational Thinking..... global1 Feb 2017 #2

Then there's the infrastructure to maintain them. rickford66 Feb 2017 #3

First thing I thought about OnlinePoker Feb 2017 #5