Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
4. Well, you would definitely be the inside expert on liars.
Mon May 1, 2017, 02:06 AM
May 2017

No one believes the claptrap you write on solar; but hey, please, keep standing on your metaphorical street corner and screech at everyone about you and 'primary literature'.

Tip - plenty of us read 'primary literature', the difference is that those of us with a genuine commitment to science understand that real science is a philosophical commitment rooted in honestly. Screeds such as you routinely offer up are so transparently dishonest and simpleminded that they scream "anti-science" with every fraudulent sentence.


BTW, how is the marketing going on that basement nuclear reactor you claim to have designed? I mean, what country are you living in now? The last I recall you swore you were going to move out of your elite New Jersey neighborhood and go outside the US to somewhere that demonstrates the proper respect for nuclear power.
Given the economics of the prevailing energy technologies, that must mean that - if you followed through with your threat to emigrate - you've ended up in Russia.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gallium arsenide based. There isn't enough gallium on the entire planet to make this useless... NNadir Apr 2017 #1
And he's back ccarrick Apr 2017 #2
Um...you know what? NNadir May 2017 #3
Well, you would definitely be the inside expert on liars. kristopher May 2017 #4
Pot and kettle ccarrick May 2017 #5
Meanwhile, even as solar and wind are inexorably declining in price kristopher May 2017 #6
The reality-based community ccarrick May 2017 #7
I'm no great fan of nuclear power but... OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #8
No blank check for outdated nukes ccarrick May 2017 #9
Well, the offshore wind projects are starting OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #10
As they build more renewables, then what obsolete generation will be turned off? kristopher May 2017 #11
I'm sorry? OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #12
How do you suggest we impose that order on a dynamic economic entity? kristopher May 2017 #13
What effect will the... NeoGreen May 2017 #14
Methane is another carbon emission and greenhouse gas, so, yes, it counts OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #15
That is pie-in-the-sky BS from the nuclear lobby. kristopher May 2017 #24
Hansen's proposed carbon fee would be a good start OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #16
In case you missed the headline - a carbon tax can't be passed kristopher May 2017 #17
Sophie Sez #1: You loaded 16 tons, what do you get? OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #18
I don't click thru on videos kristopher May 2017 #21
Too bad... so sad... OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #22
So you still can't actually engage on a point when it goes against your beliefs? kristopher May 2017 #23
Sophie Sez #2: "Obama Missed a Golden Opportunity but We Can Still Win!" OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #19
But it hasn't passed, has it? kristopher May 2017 #25
Sophie Sez #3: "$1000 for You A Better World for Your Children" OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Solar cell design with ov...»Reply #4