Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
14. What effect will the...
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:41 AM
May 2017

...decentralization of the current model of power generation to local residential/commercial renewable generation have on the economics of maintaining large electric point-production facilities and their inherent ~50% line loss?

That is to say, will the removal of the bulk of distribution line-loss have a significant positive effect toward the transition to local renewable production? Will the local production be significant enough that our overall net production/consumption of electricity could be reduced through decentralization? If so, should planning for local (decentralized) micro networks and storage be promoted? And if so, how can we leverage that advantage to preferentially target the current production modes that release the most carbon.

On a side note, is carbon the only/best metric? Should we calculate the amount of life cycle methane released by NG and its effect on climate change? Should the costs of Mercury (Hg) and other pollutants (i.e. nuclear wastes) be included in the equation in determining the worst fuels and the rank of the producers of those wastes?

Gallium arsenide based. There isn't enough gallium on the entire planet to make this useless... NNadir Apr 2017 #1
And he's back ccarrick Apr 2017 #2
Um...you know what? NNadir May 2017 #3
Well, you would definitely be the inside expert on liars. kristopher May 2017 #4
Pot and kettle ccarrick May 2017 #5
Meanwhile, even as solar and wind are inexorably declining in price kristopher May 2017 #6
The reality-based community ccarrick May 2017 #7
I'm no great fan of nuclear power but... OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #8
No blank check for outdated nukes ccarrick May 2017 #9
Well, the offshore wind projects are starting OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #10
As they build more renewables, then what obsolete generation will be turned off? kristopher May 2017 #11
I'm sorry? OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #12
How do you suggest we impose that order on a dynamic economic entity? kristopher May 2017 #13
What effect will the... NeoGreen May 2017 #14
Methane is another carbon emission and greenhouse gas, so, yes, it counts OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #15
That is pie-in-the-sky BS from the nuclear lobby. kristopher May 2017 #24
Hansen's proposed carbon fee would be a good start OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #16
In case you missed the headline - a carbon tax can't be passed kristopher May 2017 #17
Sophie Sez #1: You loaded 16 tons, what do you get? OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #18
I don't click thru on videos kristopher May 2017 #21
Too bad... so sad... OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #22
So you still can't actually engage on a point when it goes against your beliefs? kristopher May 2017 #23
Sophie Sez #2: "Obama Missed a Golden Opportunity but We Can Still Win!" OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #19
But it hasn't passed, has it? kristopher May 2017 #25
Sophie Sez #3: "$1000 for You A Better World for Your Children" OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Solar cell design with ov...»Reply #14