Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,765 posts)
1. Except compared to everything else of course
Tue May 9, 2017, 03:04 PM
May 2017

This notion that anything short of 100% reliable is equally "unreliable" is one of the more ridiculous claims.

All forms of electricity generation have some level of failure (http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/59111.pdf). The knock on variable renewables isn't that they lack 100% reliability... it's that they can't be counted on even when they're 100% operational.

while production of wind and solar power fluctuate (to use the German term), giant amounts of renewable generation capacity do not simultaneously go off-line.


As you should know... Those same Germans hit a reportedly record high in solar/wind generation a few days back (~46.5 GWs)... but in the same 24-hr period also fell to less than 1.7GW. I can't wait for the interesting spin re: how that isn't "giant amounts" that are "simultaneously off-line"

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nuclear power is unreliab...»Reply #1