Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,677 posts)
8. Can you site a single authoritative book?
Fri Jun 9, 2017, 07:07 PM
Jun 2017

Since you've read more than one and all.

You'll note that I actual provided a reference in the post I pointed you to.

Here's another:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130216175757/http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Plutonium.pdf

It allows you to calculate the specific lifetime cancer mortality risk coefficient (based on the more conservative LNT assumptions) for the amount inhaled (20,000 Bq is approximately half a million picocuries).

If the math is too difficult, you can see your memory (or the book you remember) debunked quite effectively in the prose summary:

"breathing in 5,000 respirable plutonium particles of about 3 microns each is estimated to increase an individual’s risk of incurring a fatal cancer about 1% above the U.S. average."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's a death sentence. nt Xipe Totec Jun 2017 #1
Not really FBaggins Jun 2017 #4
It probably at least led to some forgotmylogin Jun 2017 #5
My heart goes out... Zoonart Jun 2017 #2
I feel for their Family's too SonofDonald Jun 2017 #3
See my #4 - that isn't even close to being true FBaggins Jun 2017 #6
Helen Caldicot? SonofDonald Jun 2017 #7
Can you site a single authoritative book? FBaggins Jun 2017 #8
Did you start this post? SonofDonald Jun 2017 #9
A simple "No - I can't" would have sufficed FBaggins Jun 2017 #10
can I tell you , I make a point not to argue anything on line that isn't hard fact sue4e3 Jun 2017 #12
I love interesting conversations dumbcat Jun 2017 #13
This is a good place to start. kristopher Jun 2017 #11
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Japan nuclear workers inh...»Reply #8