Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The_jackalope

(1,660 posts)
6. The ERoEI of extraction is faaaar higher than agriculture.
Tue Oct 17, 2017, 07:17 AM
Oct 2017

Once part of humanity became convinced that growth and expansion was in their best interest, extraction became inevitable. This is because metals make rapid expansion possible through the use of weapons. Once that part of humanity began to expand outward using metal weapons, the fate of every new non-extractive society it bumped into was either to adopt the same practices or cease to exist.

This all began to happen in about 4000 BCE. See James DeMeo's "Saharasia" hypothesis, which I find deeply explanatory when it comes to the origins of the growth imperative, patriarchy (patrism), hierarchies and the violence associated with it all. It all seems to go back to climate change in a wide swath of land from the Sahara into the Caucasus.

Modern society seems to be the product of climate change. Ironic, no?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.9_kiloyear_event
http://www.orgonelab.org/saharasia.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Can the destruction of th...»Reply #6