Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,594 posts)
1. You don't build a nuclear plant, you get fossil fuels. The dangerous natural gas industry...
Sat Jan 6, 2018, 10:39 PM
Jan 2018

...since it has no responsibility whatsoever for containing its wastes or mining legacy for millions of years is "cheaper" since no regulations cover its external costs, only its internal costs.

By contrast, the nuclear energy is required to "prove," even to people far too stupid and uneducated to understand a proof, that it's "safe." "Safe compared to what?" is a question about which no one gives a shit.

The so called "renewable energy" industry is not actually renewable, and in any case requires a redundant natural gas plant to cover its grotesque lack of reliability.

The so called "renewable energy" industry on this planet is, after half a century of cheering, trivial, ineffective and environmentally unsustainable.

The failure of energy efficiency, even beyond Jevon's paradox, is directly tied to 2 or 3 billion people on the earth - this would be Chinese and Indians - who failed to agree to be desperately impoverished so smug Westerners could drive around in Tesla electric cars made by the subsidized billionaire Elon Musk, who for some reason is an object of worship among desperately uninformed and unenlightened self declared "environmentalists."

The United States built more than 100 commercial nuclear plants in a period of about 25 years while providing some of the cheapest electricity on the planet.

Nuclear plants now suffer from being subject to FOAKE costs - first of a kind engineering - in part because they are scrutinized to death even though nobody in this whole fucking country pays a whit of attention to the construction of a smokestack.

The problem is that the difference between a smokestack and a nuclear plant is that the smokestack will kill people whenever it operates normally, but a lot of people get their underwear in wedgies worrying themselves - in deep ignorance of engineering - of what they imagine might happen if a nuclear plant fails.

That's why we are losing 7 million lives per year on this planet every year from combustion products.

It's a great world we live in; a great world.

Have a pleasant Sunday tomorrow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Dominion/SCANA Merger Pro...»Reply #1