Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)
13. Yes really.
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 11:51 AM
Apr 2012
Expert: Nuclear Power Is On Its Deathbed

Which serves only to demonstrate that Cooper dreams the same dreams... and, of course, that anyone can be an "expert" if they hold the views you like.
Yes... those degrees in English and Sociology really make one an expert nuclear power and economics. Why oh why did I waste all those years on actual physics and econ courses? English and Sociology were much easier A's.

Nuclear giants RWE and E.ON drop plans to build new UK reactors

And other companies appear to be lining up to take their place. Not that either outcome would say anything about plants in the US.

Vogtle nuclear plant loan guarantees may not be finalized: NEI

Amd somehow in your imagination that supports the notion that both projects are "on the brink of death"? That must be a pretty big "brink".

U.S. Department of Energy must release Plant Vogtle loan guarantee credit subsidy data

And in your imagination, the only reason that a company would want to keep that data from public disclosure is because there's something in there that would keep them from getting the loan if the public knew about it... and the Obama administration is in on the deception?

Really?

And we can just ignore the flood of companies vying for new reactor builds in the next few years, right? They just haven't gotten the "brink" message.

He also says "As this drama unfolds, the collapse of global nuclear power continues" - which further demonstrates his illusion (and likely yours given your read on the UK reactors). The net global picture is almost entirely unchanged. Hardly a "collapse".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cooler heads are prevailing. nm rhett o rick Apr 2012 #1
If taxpayers aren't forced to cover the risk, then a new nuke is nowhere near feasible. qb Apr 2012 #2
Good news! felix_numinous Apr 2012 #3
Good now that the most expensive form of energy is off the table, can we get on with real green Vincardog Apr 2012 #4
There is every indication that the price points for Solar and Wind FogerRox Apr 2012 #5
+1 madokie Apr 2012 #10
This post has been up for over four hours... DCKit Apr 2012 #6
They've been waiting for me to... SpoonFed Apr 2012 #8
Your modesty is an example for us all. nt DCKit Apr 2012 #9
Lol! Wasserman has a wet dream and treats it as if it were reality... FBaggins Apr 2012 #11
Really? See also kristopher Apr 2012 #12
Yes really. FBaggins Apr 2012 #13
Poor little feller just ain't got a clue... kristopher Apr 2012 #14
You can always tell when Kris knows he doesn't have a sound argument FBaggins Apr 2012 #15
Wishing has nothing to do with it. kristopher Apr 2012 #17
Call it a wish... call it a fantasy... whatever FBaggins Apr 2012 #18
Sure, Baggins. Bad economics and high risk always propel growth... kristopher Apr 2012 #19
It's your imagination that it's "high risk" FBaggins Apr 2012 #20
Post 14 show that more govt support for nuclear is corporate welfare. kristopher Apr 2012 #21
The CBO's analysis kristopher Apr 2012 #43
How much did you pay for YOUR solar setup? XemaSab Apr 2012 #16
I suspect it's a case of "do what I say... Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #22
That's a really strong allegation to make against someone XemaSab Apr 2012 #23
A mere suspision Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #24
You have a link for that? XemaSab Apr 2012 #25
sure... Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #26
Hey, a lot of people out here have trucks 'cause they live on big ranches XemaSab Apr 2012 #27
Indeed. Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #31
Heh, to be fair, some people need a pickup. joshcryer Apr 2012 #40
This exchange sounds precisely like the rightwing attacks on Al Gore. kristopher Apr 2012 #30
I thought it was a reasonable question XemaSab Apr 2012 #32
Of course you did... kristopher Apr 2012 #33
You're talking all the time about how cheap solar and wind are XemaSab Apr 2012 #34
Your question had nothing to do with the topic kristopher Apr 2012 #35
If we're going to get rid of the energy that comes from nuclear today XemaSab Apr 2012 #36
Erm, you're the one interjecting economics into the thing. joshcryer Apr 2012 #39
Well, walking your talk says a lot about your credibility. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #42
Yeah, and, generally putting your money where your mouth is... joshcryer Apr 2012 #38
Al Gore is carbon negative. joshcryer Apr 2012 #37
Good. n/t GliderGuider Apr 2012 #7
Yes it is, isn't it? nt kristopher Apr 2012 #44
Vogtle Nuclear Construction Faces “Additional Delay” Based on Miscalculations in Foundation Concrete kristopher Apr 2012 #28
Exelon CEO: (nuclear) "is on the backs of the ratepayers, not the backs of the shareholders" kristopher Apr 2012 #29
Nuclear industry dreams dashed by current economic reality kristopher Apr 2012 #41
The spreading global economic crisis is going to put a major crimp in nuclear plans in many places. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #45
Absolutely... as will low gas prices in some countries. FBaggins Apr 2012 #46
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»America's 2 New Nukes Are...»Reply #13