Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,285 posts)
2. I guess we're saved then. On the other hand, it's pretty damned hot out there.
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 10:21 PM
Jul 2018

4,300 "megawatts" of a solar power plant that is available 10% of the time is the equivalent of a very small gas plant, a 430 MW plant operating at 100% capacity utilization.

4300 "megawatts" of a wind plant operating 30% of the time is the equivalent of a 1,300 MW power plant, an average sized power plant operating at 100"% capacity utilization.

According to the EIA, in 2017, US energy consumption was 103.7 exajoules. Dividing this number by the number of seconds in a year, we find that US average continuous power consumption was 3.27 trillion watts, or just under 3,270,000 MW.

This suggests that the "renewable energy portfolio" (at best, if it's all wind) amounts to 0.04% of US average power demand, and of course, this does count the energy cost of firing up a gas plant when the sun isn't shining or the wind isn't blowing.

I'm impressed.

We should declare victory and forget about how damned hot it is this week all over this planet.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»In US Midwest, Most Utili...»Reply #2