Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(127,158 posts)
3. The fact that they had the reinsurance contracts and transferred some of the risks
Tue Dec 4, 2018, 10:03 AM
Dec 2018

means that the company the capacity to underwrite more policies. It really depends on the terms of their reinsurance treaties as to whether they properly transferred that risk. Some treaties transfer a set percentage of all risks such as the 90% figure that you quoted, while other treaties may transfer 100% of the risk above a set dollar amount to reinsurance (meaning that a lot of relatively small claims like $25K and $30K vehicles could cripple a company). Other reinsurance treaties may transfer business based upon the lines of business (auto, general liability, homeowners, workers comp, etc.)

The good news is that most policyholders should recover most of their losses from the state guaranty fund, although there will be delays in processing claims. The most exposed are those that own more expensive properties if their loss exceeds the amount that the guaranty fund pays.

The bad news is that the sales and marketing staff will be terminated almost immediately. Most of the underwriting, actuarial, and HR staff will follow in the next few months. The executive staff, statistical, accounts payable, claims, in-house counsel and IT personnel will be around for a longer period of time and will likely be offered bonuses to remain with the company and assist in the liquidation of the company.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Judge Rules CA Insurer In...»Reply #3