Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
3. Both Vancouver and Port Arthur/Houston have supertanker
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 04:00 PM
Apr 2012

loading facilities proposed. From Houston they can easily ship to the Western EU, 100's of miles less than Mid East oil shipped by supertanker, (cant go thru the Suez) around the Cape of Good Hope (Africa). Supertankers loaded in Vancouver can ship to Asia, which again would be 100's of miles shorter than Mid East oil shipped to Asia. Remember that the Panama and Suez canals cannot handle large tankers. The routes I describe avoid both these canals, giving the Tar Sands Partners a better margin than ME oil.

SO pipielines from ALberta to both coasts gives the Albert Tar Sands partners acess to Asian and EU markets, with shorter shipping routes than mid East oil.

Though, I would guess youre wrong about any contracts at this time. But thats not the point, being to ship 3 or 4 million barrels a day to markets where you have a advantage in shippings costs compared to ME oil, is a huge incentive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How Keystone Pipeline wil...»Reply #3