Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,880 posts)
23. I see you commented along similar lines above. The biggest issue I see with Haber-Bosch...
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 09:56 AM
Mar 2019

...as a huge industrial process - even without the scale up to make ammonia for cars, which must not be allowed to take place - is, in fact, nitrogen oxides, specifically nitrous oxide, N2O.

Your point is equally as important as mine, nitrogen oxides, an inevitable consequence of the distribution of ammonia based chemicals.

By the end of this century, the accumulation of this gas, N2O, in the atmosphere - it's rising fairly rapidly - is going to displace CFC's as the primary source of ozone depletion. Like the CFC's, it's also a climate forcing gas, but that's not the worst of it.

Since the early 20th century we have greatly shifted the nitrogen equilibrium on this planet as a whole. While the issues are broadly discussed in the primary scientific literature, they have not yet made it widely into public consciousness like, say, climate change has.

One could imagine easily, were ammonia to become a common fuel item - perish the thought - a huge political denial lobby being formed to announce that ammonia deaths, destruction of the ozone layer, destruction of almost all the fresh water supplies on earth, etc, etc, etc, are not worth the economic cost of shifting away from it.

This is rather the same thing we see with dangerous fossil fuels today, of course.

It's been a very long time since I was in the lab, by the way, but I certainly recall the risks of liquid ammonia, with which the lab in which I was working, was using on a small pilot scale. It was nothing exotic, simple sodium amide stuff. We had those (glass) reactors in a walk-in hood, and lots of acid traps in the line. Even so it was still very scary in a sense; not as scary as other liquified gases like phosgene - and less scary than HF - but still worthy of lots of respect for the danger.

I once had some guys working for me screw up with liquid HF. They weren't injured but came to my office to ask me what they should do. Liquid HF was spilled all over the hood - but since I had obviously failed to train them sufficiently (although I was relatively new in my position) I made them all leave the lab, and cleaned up the mess myself. That was the most frightening chemical event of my life. It was twenty or thirty gram quantities, maybe a little more, fuming, and I suited up (in record time), even though it was in the hood. I imagine though, that a broken reactor with a few kilos of liquid ammonia spilling out, might have been worse. It's easy to neutralize HF with excess calcium carbonate; but with ammonia, one has to have a sense of the stoichiometry, since strong acids are themselves corrosive and somewhat dangerous.

I really hope this scheme goes nowhere.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #1
I thought it was pretty interesting, sounds promising - and something that we won't hear on the news Rhiannon12866 Mar 2019 #2
We won't hear about it as you say Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #3
And the environment really ought to be at the forefront of news these days Rhiannon12866 Mar 2019 #4
Precisely Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #5
...because it isn't in the interests of watoos Mar 2019 #11
Precisely Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #14
It's a mixed blessing. TexasTowelie Mar 2019 #7
Thanks for the information Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #13
While it may reduce carbon emissions there will be a tradeoff. TexasTowelie Mar 2019 #6
Thanks for weighing in! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2019 #8
Yep, NOx is just as bad as SOx. KY_EnviroGuy Mar 2019 #9
"Unless they use solar or wind to power the ammonia machines..." jberryhill Mar 2019 #22
And, when questioned on that little detail, they would say.... KY_EnviroGuy Mar 2019 #33
according to the article garybeck Mar 2019 #34
What industry would that be? jberryhill Mar 2019 #35
Drive past a Oil Refinery CDerekGo Mar 2019 #26
Yes, and I've worked in a number of them. KY_EnviroGuy Mar 2019 #32
Here you go.... jberryhill Mar 2019 #36
Thank you, JBH. A very interesting design. KY_EnviroGuy Mar 2019 #38
It would be good on farm use where you don't have to "punch it." 3Hotdogs Mar 2019 #15
I've never understood why farms don't run on algae oil? Finishline42 Mar 2019 #27
True, but... TreasonousBastard Mar 2019 #17
Great idea tiptonic Mar 2019 #10
Bingo. watoos Mar 2019 #12
Catch and kill isn't only for the news media mitch96 Mar 2019 #28
How do they manage to do that jberryhill Mar 2019 #37
Ammonia is another energy storage chemical. Energy storage requires a source of primary energy. NNadir Mar 2019 #16
OK, that puts a different spin on it. TreasonousBastard Mar 2019 #18
I was waiting for you to comment on this thread. TexasTowelie Mar 2019 #19
I see you commented along similar lines above. The biggest issue I see with Haber-Bosch... NNadir Mar 2019 #23
Thanks for the summary exboyfil Mar 2019 #20
Thanks for the emphasis on the 2nd law of thermodynamics - you can't get something for free erronis Mar 2019 #21
Thank you NNadir, I always learn something from your posts. And aside from the refresher c-rational Mar 2019 #24
Excellent rebuttal. defacto7 Mar 2019 #29
My first thought was about safeinOhio Mar 2019 #25
This brings back a funny memory to me. Many years ago justhanginon Mar 2019 #30
Ammonia is commonly used as a refrigerant in the agricultural industry. hunter Mar 2019 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»He's Creating A New Fuel ...»Reply #23