Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
8. Poll vs. Poll
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 09:25 PM
Apr 2012
Citizens across world oppose nuclear power, poll finds

A new opinion poll from Ipsos MORI tells us: 62% of citizens in 24 countries across the world oppose the use of nuclear energy, with a quarter of those having changed their minds after the Fukushima disaster.

So what stands out? The most anti-nuclear nations in the poll, at about 80% against, were Italy, Germany and Mexico. Only three of the 24 countries had majorities that favoured nuclear power: India (61%), Poland (57%) and the US (52%). The UK and Sweden were split 50-50 within the uncertainty cited.

In France, where most of the electricity is produced by nuclear, 67% opposed it, the same percentage as in coal-rich Australia. Perhaps surprisingly, 42% of people in Japan, still recovering from the huge tremor that wrecked the Fukushima nuclear plant, remain supportive of nuclear power.

The pollsters also asked whether people opposed other ways of generating electricity. With 62% against, nuclear was the least popular, followed by coal (52% against), gas (20%), hydroelectricity (9%), wind power (7%) and solar power (3%).

It's worth keeping in mind that it's not the middle-of-the-road opponents who cause nuclear plans to be cancelled. It's the hard-core opponents, out a couple of sigmas from the mean. Any increase in either the number or dedication of those opponents presents a powerful challenge to the trans-national corporatist agenda for nuclear power. That 25% number I bolded above hints that this is what is happening.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Manufacturing little Fukishimas and Chernobyls Cooley Hurd Apr 2012 #1
These designs are dramatically safer than either of those. FBaggins Apr 2012 #2
In their dreams. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #3
Hardly. FBaggins Apr 2012 #4
We'll see. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #5
Well yes... but... FBaggins Apr 2012 #6
It hasn't actually been all that long yet. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #7
Well... the last point is certainly correct. FBaggins Apr 2012 #11
It really doesn't matter if I get how this particular industry might work. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #12
Poll vs. Poll GliderGuider Apr 2012 #8
Not really. FBaggins Apr 2012 #9
Mmmm GliderGuider Apr 2012 #10
morons, they should corner the market on buggy whips instead, less toxic, more up-to-date diane in sf Apr 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Missouri Seeks to Become ...»Reply #8