Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,763 posts)
9. Not really.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 09:37 PM
Apr 2012

One is a global survey taken just weeks after a major nuclear disaster (and even then still showed support in the US).

The other is a very current poll of americans taken by the premier polling firm in the country.

It's worth keeping in mind that it's not the middle-of-the-road opponents who cause nuclear plans to be cancelled. It's the hard-core opponents, out a couple of sigmas from the mean.

That was certainly true three decades ago. Their influence appears to have waned.

That 25% number I bolded above hints that this is what is happening.

Hints thats what was happening a year ago. Did you know that they ran the poll again six months later?

Public Support for Nuclear Energy makes early recovery after Fukushima

The latest face-to-face survey of the British public by Ipsos MORI shows that public support for nuclear energy has bounced back strongly since its June 2011 low point in the wake of the Fukushima incident in Japan in March.

http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/2903/Nuclear-Energy-Update-Poll.aspx


Public support had been generally climbing for years prior to fukushima. It took a very understandable dip in the wake of fukushima... but there's every indication that much of the dip was temporary.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Manufacturing little Fukishimas and Chernobyls Cooley Hurd Apr 2012 #1
These designs are dramatically safer than either of those. FBaggins Apr 2012 #2
In their dreams. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #3
Hardly. FBaggins Apr 2012 #4
We'll see. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #5
Well yes... but... FBaggins Apr 2012 #6
It hasn't actually been all that long yet. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #7
Well... the last point is certainly correct. FBaggins Apr 2012 #11
It really doesn't matter if I get how this particular industry might work. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #12
Poll vs. Poll GliderGuider Apr 2012 #8
Not really. FBaggins Apr 2012 #9
Mmmm GliderGuider Apr 2012 #10
morons, they should corner the market on buggy whips instead, less toxic, more up-to-date diane in sf Apr 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Missouri Seeks to Become ...»Reply #9