Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,763 posts)
11. Well... the last point is certainly correct.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 09:52 PM
Apr 2012

Economic weakness will continue to dampen demand and that (along with desire to preserve capital) will certainly cut demand for high-dollar projects.

But you're missing how that works in this case. We're talking about building an industry that produces small modular reactors. They're cheaper (certainly on a gross basis), so capital concerns are less of an issue. More importantly, the economic hit is not the same all around the world. There are plenty of countries with rapid growth and many of them want nuclear power and lots of it. This specific option is very exportable (and more of the work stays here).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Manufacturing little Fukishimas and Chernobyls Cooley Hurd Apr 2012 #1
These designs are dramatically safer than either of those. FBaggins Apr 2012 #2
In their dreams. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #3
Hardly. FBaggins Apr 2012 #4
We'll see. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #5
Well yes... but... FBaggins Apr 2012 #6
It hasn't actually been all that long yet. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #7
Well... the last point is certainly correct. FBaggins Apr 2012 #11
It really doesn't matter if I get how this particular industry might work. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #12
Poll vs. Poll GliderGuider Apr 2012 #8
Not really. FBaggins Apr 2012 #9
Mmmm GliderGuider Apr 2012 #10
morons, they should corner the market on buggy whips instead, less toxic, more up-to-date diane in sf Apr 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Missouri Seeks to Become ...»Reply #11