Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vogon_Glory

(10,297 posts)
8. Unh Hunh And Internal-Combustion Is So Environmentally-Friendly
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 09:47 AM
Apr 2012

"Electric cars are less-efficient than gasoline-powered". Actually, that's a crock, even with today's batteries. Admittedly, current electric vehicles do need to be recharged more frequently than internal combustion cars need to be fueled, but the tech can be improved on.

As for "nothing green about them"? Do you enjoy breathing the fumes from i/c cars wafting from the streets and roadways? Do you think that drilling for oil and the pipelines that carry the product are environmentally benign? Do you think that oil refineries are clean and non-toxic?

Yeah, the batteries are going to have to be recycled. But that's a trade-off and at worst it's comparable to the messes made in the production, transport, and distribution of gasoline and diesel fuel currently propelling most of the world's transportation network.

The idea of battery-powered vehicles and clean air in major cities appeals to me. So does the notion of getting away from the pollution caused by the petroleum economy and the whims of the nasty little crooks profiteering from it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Go IBM! (more) longship Apr 2012 #1
Electric cars are BS KurtNYC Apr 2012 #2
ROFLMAO kristopher Apr 2012 #3
Unlimited amounts of lithium charged with 33% efficient coal fired grid power, KurtNYC Apr 2012 #16
I've never seen any serious proposals to move 18-wheelers with batteries NickB79 Apr 2012 #32
Only if you're using the Republican dictionary to define "efficient" and "green". DCKit Apr 2012 #4
Republican dictionary ? You're the one blindly and poorly defending an IBM press release. KurtNYC Apr 2012 #17
$0.04/mile running costs not low enough? Not efficient? Not green? DCKit Apr 2012 #20
Generally where electric rates are higher then so are gas prices txlibdem Apr 2012 #26
PS, in Albany, New York gas is over $4 a gallon. txlibdem Apr 2012 #27
Preaching to the choir. I just can't afford the premium for an electric. DCKit Apr 2012 #29
The Leaf goes 100 miles txlibdem Apr 2012 #30
less efficient? caraher Apr 2012 #6
Let's start with charging the batteries KurtNYC Apr 2012 #15
The difference in efficiencies between the electric motor (90%) and ICE (25-30%) is what counts IDemo Apr 2012 #18
How much of electricity do you think is coal generated? dmallind Apr 2012 #21
Electric engines are about 90% efficient. Combustion barely breaks 30%. joshcryer Apr 2012 #25
Unh Hunh And Internal-Combustion Is So Environmentally-Friendly Vogon_Glory Apr 2012 #8
i/c engines usrname Apr 2012 #9
It's about decoupling the energy generation from the energy storage jeff47 Apr 2012 #10
My electric car costs less than $30/month to run. tinrobot Apr 2012 #22
Looks like the IBM PR department is earning their salaries. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #5
Great. Hope it doesn't take 10 years for it to happen n2doc Apr 2012 #7
Their forcast is for 2020-2030. jeff47 Apr 2012 #11
No they aren't. n2doc Apr 2012 #12
The Leaf is a 4-door family car. You can't pretend it's "comparable" to tiny 2-door. jeff47 Apr 2012 #13
You may think so n2doc Apr 2012 #14
They won't, because of how they're marketed jeff47 Apr 2012 #19
Compare cost of ownership, not purchase price. tinrobot Apr 2012 #23
And there you go for those of us living in the real world. DCKit Apr 2012 #24
Oh, and insurance is less for the Leaf tinrobot Apr 2012 #33
+1 txlibdem Apr 2012 #31
As an aside... Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Big 'Green'? IBM works on...»Reply #8