Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: China keen on action in global efforts against climate change [View all]FBaggins
(28,706 posts)9. You seem to have a creative memory.
Since the awakening they have been steadily scaling back or slowing down the classic approach and rolling their huge incoming cash flow into both positioning themselves for the coming global market in renewable technology and meeting their own needs with renewables.
What a convenient blind spot that you have. The reality is that they continued to increase their reliance on nuclear power right up until Fukushima... the only result of which appears to be a one-year hiccup.
You've tried this nonsense before. Remember your claims that it was really a single corrupt official who was responsible for their nuclear daliances... and once the projects that were already underway were completed, they would be stepping back out? How many days did it take for that one to die?
The reality is that they have the most agressive nuclear expansion program in the world... yet you allow yourself to play 3Monkeys and sing their praises as a model for the world.
As to hydro I haven't looked too much at that. It is a (limited) large scale resource that they have the right to develop as they see fit. The scale of 3 Gorges is something that troubles me in much the same way that nuclear does, however. The probability of catastrophic failure is low, but the consequences should it happen would be a nation-altering event for them.
Now there's an odd reaction. Tell me... what would you estimate the consequences would be of a worst-case scenario?
What a convenient blind spot that you have. The reality is that they continued to increase their reliance on nuclear power right up until Fukushima... the only result of which appears to be a one-year hiccup.
You've tried this nonsense before. Remember your claims that it was really a single corrupt official who was responsible for their nuclear daliances... and once the projects that were already underway were completed, they would be stepping back out? How many days did it take for that one to die?
The reality is that they have the most agressive nuclear expansion program in the world... yet you allow yourself to play 3Monkeys and sing their praises as a model for the world.
As to hydro I haven't looked too much at that. It is a (limited) large scale resource that they have the right to develop as they see fit. The scale of 3 Gorges is something that troubles me in much the same way that nuclear does, however. The probability of catastrophic failure is low, but the consequences should it happen would be a nation-altering event for them.
Now there's an odd reaction. Tell me... what would you estimate the consequences would be of a worst-case scenario?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What happens if by 2015 the price of solar generated electricity is far less than nuclear?
kristopher
Dec 2011
#23
Retiring plants are being retired for inefficiency, not to phase out coal. They will double coal...
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#18