Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(22,048 posts)
2. Here you go...
Sun Mar 31, 2019, 10:26 PM
Mar 2019
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/68960.pdf
Timescales of Energy Storage Needed for Reducing Renewable Energy Curtailment



5 Conclusions



Our modeling shows that the amount of VG curtailed is a function of wind and PV generation patterns and the size of energy storage deployed. Overall, our results suggest that relatively short-duration energy storage might offer an effective path to integrating VG at penetrations up to 55%. Across all the mixes of wind and solar resources analyzed, at least half of the potential avoided-curtailment benefits are realized with 8 hours of storage, and the first 4 hours provide the largest benefit. A 4-hour duration also offers a relatively high capacity value, which is critical to the economics of storage. Cost improvements might make storage with durations of 6 or even 8 hours viable, but there appears to be little value in deploying very-long-duration or seasonal storage at VG penetrations up to 55%.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Maui's largest solar proj...»Reply #2