Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

captain queeg

(11,780 posts)
20. Well, congrats to the engineer who looked at this and justified the conversion
Mon Aug 26, 2019, 11:14 PM
Aug 2019

Not many situations where this would work. No doubt a significant initial investment that had to be justified up front.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is outstanding. onecaliberal Aug 2019 #1
When Formula One began using K.E.R.S. House of Roberts Aug 2019 #2
Meanwhile, the US wants to bring back coal... hlthe2b Aug 2019 #3
I'm pretty sure that these would work just fine in an open pit strip mine. Cleetus Ford Aug 2019 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Aug 2019 #6
Cheap coal is unaffordable. Coal at any price is unaffordable. marble falls Aug 2019 #7
Nicely stated packman Aug 2019 #13
what if it is not going up and down hills? pangaia Aug 2019 #4
Not to worry! If it's hauling out of a mine or quarry then abqtommy Aug 2019 #8
Ha Ha,, Shows you how much I know... pangaia Aug 2019 #9
It only works because it is moving mass from a higher elevation to a lower one progree Aug 2019 #10
Or to say it more correctly, it works because of the type of work that the truck does. ffr Aug 2019 #11
I was responding to the comments that I replied to, not to your OP progree Aug 2019 #12
Wow! A perpetual motion machine! NNadir Aug 2019 #14
A perpetual motion machine would work with no external energy inputs jmowreader Aug 2019 #15
So it's only used once? NNadir Aug 2019 #16
Not at all jmowreader Aug 2019 #17
And it's propelled up the hill with zero mass? The truck loads itself with mass without energy? NNadir Aug 2019 #18
#10 explains it. There is no claim to being a perpetual motion machine -- though it would keep progree Aug 2019 #19
Well, congrats to the engineer who looked at this and justified the conversion captain queeg Aug 2019 #20
saving 11,000 to 22,000 gals of diesel fuel per year alone justifies it Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #21
It's essentially being "recharged" by all the energy used to mine the ore NickB79 Aug 2019 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»WTH? 110-ton electric veh...»Reply #20