Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

60. "imperiously ordering"?

Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:30 AM

Apr 2012

That's too bad you remember it that way. What I recall was an long screed filled with misinformation designed to deflate the belief that renewables were able to meet our needs - a position contradicted by every peer reviewed energy study out there.
You further led the gullible reader to the conclusion that if there was any hope for us at all, it was in the bare possibility that nuclear just might be something we could do.

Yes, I recall pointing all of that out to you, but it was largely in private emails as I recall. As for ordering you to do anything...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Table - German power [View all] Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 OP

Boy, that's a shitload of coal spewing toxins and CO2 into the air. TheWraith Apr 2012 #1

And yet they continue to decrease overall emissions. kristopher Apr 2012 #2

Are you refering to the 25 million ton increase? Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #3

You are acting like a climate denier... kristopher Apr 2012 #4

If you are including all the data.. Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #5

No... they aren't. FBaggins Apr 2012 #7

Out of interest, kris... Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #8

The government and the utilities that push nuclear and coal kristopher Apr 2012 #10

Yes kris. That's why I asked. Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #11

They have split personalities of course. FBaggins Apr 2012 #13

Noticed you ran from this same discussion at your thread on the same topic kristopher Apr 2012 #17

How odd... you misspelled "imagined" as "noticed". FBaggins Apr 2012 #18

What's the specific *market* mechanism by which nuclear shuts down coal? kristopher Apr 2012 #19

In the real world, ALMOST ALL power is subsidized in some way or another. XemaSab Apr 2012 #20

Poor xemasab... kristopher Apr 2012 #21

What does your consulting company do then? XemaSab Apr 2012 #23

What consulting company? kristopher Apr 2012 #24

Wink wink nudge nudge say no more XemaSab Apr 2012 #27

What consulting company? kristopher Apr 2012 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author XemaSab Apr 2012 #29

Still waiting. Either provide specifics or retract your insinuation. kristopher Apr 2012 #30

Kris, you've said you're an independant analyst Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #31

Two things: XemaSab Apr 2012 #36

What consulting company? kristopher Apr 2012 #37

Here's the deal: XemaSab Apr 2012 #38

Bullpucky. You've been party to stalking me off of DU. kristopher Apr 2012 #39

You said you weren't paid. joshcryer Apr 2012 #40

How do you arrive at that logic? kristopher Apr 2012 #42

OK, I'm confused Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #48

Finally you are listening, but you still aren't quite getting it. kristopher Apr 2012 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author XemaSab Apr 2012 #52

That's a nice cushy role you've chosen for yourself there. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #53

Who said it is a luxury? kristopher Apr 2012 #54

Irony's not dead XemaSab Apr 2012 #55

Poor Xemasab... What's the specific *market* mechanism by which nuclear shuts down coal? kristopher Apr 2012 #56

You can frame it however you want for yourself GliderGuider Apr 2012 #57

That perception by you and yours developed in direct proportion kristopher Apr 2012 #58

Oh, my perception goes back a lot further than that. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #59

"imperiously ordering"? kristopher Apr 2012 #60

The issue isn't whether we were right or wrong GliderGuider Apr 2012 #61

Turnabout is fair play XemaSab Apr 2012 #41

Again... kristopher Apr 2012 #43

So you think I am influenced by dark motives? XemaSab Apr 2012 #44

An business license that hasn't been used in 6 years doesn't turn up on a routine google search. kristopher Apr 2012 #45

It shows up on the special google XemaSab Apr 2012 #46

Oh, wait, sorry XemaSab Apr 2012 #47

It's so cute that you think EITHER has anything to do with market forces. FBaggins Apr 2012 #49

You really haven't got a clue and are not interested in learning. kristopher Apr 2012 #51

At least there is an increase in storage Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #6

Pity they didn't give capacity figures, though... nt Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #9

Umm ... did you mean a different type of "capacity"? Nihil Apr 2012 #12

Sorry, I meant as in MWh Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #14

OK - that makes sense. Nihil Apr 2012 #15

The fucking coal will be economically unextractable by 2035. joshcryer Apr 2012 #25

Economies of scale Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #26

No, I mean, I guess I should say it will be declining at that point. joshcryer Apr 2012 #32

Not sure that applies to German lignite... Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #33

Oops, see post #34, I replied to myself! joshcryer Apr 2012 #35

See these comments: joshcryer Apr 2012 #34

Still doesn't make it right to use nuclear power madokie Apr 2012 #16

Fair enough... Dead_Parrot Apr 2012 #22