Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. No he isn't.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:04 PM
Apr 2012

Thorium is a scam and that particular piece of rationalization you are using doesn't pass the smell test.
There is a thorium fuel cycle - true.
It can be made to work - true.

But that is as far as it goes. There is a very competitive environment for vendors of nuclear power and if there were a fuel cycle that was better overall at addressing the cost, waste, safety and proliferation issues then it would be available for sale so that someone could be cornering the market with that "better mousetrap".

This rational - put forth by the those who want federal money for their personal gain - is on a par with claims that automakers are suppressing 100mpg cars that run on water.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Bill Gates disses efficie...»Reply #5