Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
28. The article in the OP also says thousands of years
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 05:57 AM
Apr 2012

and your other post about this century refers to thermal expansion, not ice sheet collapse.
This thread is about ice sheet collapse.

When the Antarctic ice sheets collapse, there will be a large sea level rise in a matter of hours,
according to the discussion from a few years ago.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=63301&mesg_id=63511

happyslug (1000+ posts) Thu Aug-10-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #20

22. I suspect it will be a gradual raise within a 24 hour period.
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 03:48 PM by happyslug

Remember a Tsunami is the product of a rapid change in sea floor levels that acts like an agitator on a washing machine. If the WAIS just starts to move into the Southern Ocean (The technical name for th ocean around Antarctica) you may NOT have a rapid agitation but a gradual but rapid raise.

Now I have read about the Azores' Volcano. Every so often (In geological terms which can means once every couple of thousand years) the side of the Island falls into the Atlantic and causes a Tsunami in the direction of New York City. This Tsunami is caused by a rapid fall into he ocean o a huge amount of Earth. While I do NOT see the WAIS doing the same, it might very while act the same way, no one nows and from i have read there is no evidence of such a Tsunami the last time the WAIS collapsed.

Now, what may happen is the Collapse of the WAIS leads to a Tsunami but directed straight alone the International date line Ross sea, so that any resulting Tsunami will not hit anything till the Aleutian islands and then Alaska and Siberia. The same with the Ronne Ice Shelf, it may direct any Tsunami to the "gold coast" of Africa (Nigeria, Liberia etc). Either way no direct affect on Europe or America (Both North and South America). This is complicated by the existence of the Ross and Ronne Ice Shelves, which may act as a barrier to any Tsunami from forming (i.e. The Tsunami expends its energy moving the Ross and Ronne Ice Sheets out to sea to permit the Ice Sheets to follow.

Thus what I suspect will happen is just a steady increase in sea level as opposed to a Tsunami, but since I have no records from 100,000 years ago when this last may have happen your guess may be as good as mine.


Here is a map of Antarctica, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is between the Ross and Ronne Ice Shelves on the Map (just South of South America):

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Every cloud has a silver lining. Downwinder Apr 2012 #1
Not when they're all sharp_stick Apr 2012 #3
The rest of the country has been underwater due to DC DJ13 Apr 2012 #2
Right? Turnabout is fair play after all... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #4
We could get to full employment moving everything Downwinder Apr 2012 #5
For all the snarking, remember the actual RESIDENTS of DC would be absolutely screwed... Scuba Apr 2012 #6
Not just residents of DC, residents of almost all coastal areas. 300k people a year. joshcryer Apr 2012 #16
That's a good place for Washington, D.C. n/t man4allcats Apr 2012 #7
Okay, D.C. is toast. I mean, swamp. Wasn't it built on one to being with, LOL. freshwest Apr 2012 #8
You are getting to the point of my new book.... MindMover Apr 2012 #9
with great chaos comes the opportunity for profit grasswire Apr 2012 #10
With chaos comes opportunity. MindMover Apr 2012 #11
What's the time scale on this? nt bananas Apr 2012 #12
From the abstract: "cannot yet be predicted" joshcryer Apr 2012 #15
Thousands of years. bananas Apr 2012 #19
Source? joshcryer Apr 2012 #20
I added a source before I saw your reply. nt bananas Apr 2012 #21
some discussion from a few years ago bananas Apr 2012 #22
"a few years ago" joshcryer Apr 2012 #26
The article in the OP also says thousands of years bananas Apr 2012 #28
Where does the OP say "thousands of years"? joshcryer Apr 2012 #29
Sorry, I meant the OP of the thread you linked to in post #16 bananas Apr 2012 #31
The judge in the British lawsuit against "An Inconvenient Truth" also said thousands of years bananas Apr 2012 #32
West Anarctica Ice Sheet arachadillo Apr 2012 #23
The vast majority of ice loss in the 500 billion ton number comes from the Antarctic. joshcryer Apr 2012 #30
Here's a helpful graph OKIsItJustMe Apr 2012 #13
Looks like an exponential curve to me... joshcryer Apr 2012 #17
Font issue RobertEarl Apr 2012 #18
Time Frame arachadillo Apr 2012 #24
So that graph is primarily due to the ozone layer repairing itself? nt bananas Apr 2012 #27
Comparative Polar Warming Trends arachadillo Apr 2012 #33
Dear GOP knuckleheads "It's' not nice to food mother nature" n/t kickysnana Apr 2012 #14
Might improve the place, LOL! Odin2005 Apr 2012 #25
The sooner the better. Nihil Apr 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Collapse Of Antarctic Ice...»Reply #28