Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Future of America's Nuclear Power Plants [View all]bananas
(27,509 posts)1. Nuclear waste has to be contained for a million years
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x303779
Danger: Radioactive Waste: A Message in a Bottle to Last a Million Years (French Waste Agency)
"For long-lived waste such as that produced through reprocessing, we need to demonstrate it will be secure for millions of years."
"A million years should not be viewed as a definitive statement by the French Nuclear Safety Agency (NSA) on what is acceptable because, really, the timeline could extend much further"
<snip>
Danger: Radioactive Waste: A Message in a Bottle to Last a Million Years (French Waste Agency)
"For long-lived waste such as that produced through reprocessing, we need to demonstrate it will be secure for millions of years."
"A million years should not be viewed as a definitive statement by the French Nuclear Safety Agency (NSA) on what is acceptable because, really, the timeline could extend much further"
<snip>
]http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=201750&mesg_id=201990
31. No, it wasn't a "smokescreen".
The EPA wanted a 10,000 year standard and wouldn't change it until they were ordered to by a court in one of the lawsuits over Yucca Mountain. This Slate article has links to the NAS report and the court order: http://www.slate.com/id/2212792
<snip>
31. No, it wasn't a "smokescreen".
The EPA wanted a 10,000 year standard and wouldn't change it until they were ordered to by a court in one of the lawsuits over Yucca Mountain. This Slate article has links to the NAS report and the court order: http://www.slate.com/id/2212792
<snip>
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x142758
The Externalities of Nuclear Power: First, Assume We Have a Can Opener . . .
<snip>
While the impacts of global warming are described as intergenerational, the impacts of the nuclear waste cycle are better described as inter-civilizational.<2> Nuclear fuel wastes remain hazardous for hundreds of thousands to as much as a million years.<3> By contrast, recorded human history goes back only about 5,000 years, and human civilization is only about 10,000 years old. Globally, none of the generators of nuclear fuel waste have successfully implemented any permanent disposal option for nuclear waste, leaving this externality of nuclear energy production as a problem for future generations, or, more likely, for future civilizations. Put simply, the nuclear industry, with government complicity, has transferred and deferred the most expensive part of the cost of the nuclear fuel cycle to future generations and civilizations unknown.
<snip>
The Externalities of Nuclear Power: First, Assume We Have a Can Opener . . .
<snip>
While the impacts of global warming are described as intergenerational, the impacts of the nuclear waste cycle are better described as inter-civilizational.<2> Nuclear fuel wastes remain hazardous for hundreds of thousands to as much as a million years.<3> By contrast, recorded human history goes back only about 5,000 years, and human civilization is only about 10,000 years old. Globally, none of the generators of nuclear fuel waste have successfully implemented any permanent disposal option for nuclear waste, leaving this externality of nuclear energy production as a problem for future generations, or, more likely, for future civilizations. Put simply, the nuclear industry, with government complicity, has transferred and deferred the most expensive part of the cost of the nuclear fuel cycle to future generations and civilizations unknown.
<snip>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Renewable energy sources are more than capable of meeting modern society's needs.
kristopher
May 2012
#23