Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NNadir

(37,676 posts)

4. Thank you. I'm very proud of looking at data and not marketing.

Reply to DBoon (Reply #3)

Wed Apr 22, 2020, 02:21 PM

Apr 2020

I am especially happy if people find that "detestable" find it "detestable."

I stand by what I see. My generation consumed all the world's best resources and converted them to waste in a giant party devoted to ignorance.

We apparently have a very different view of what "detestable" is.

The data is clear. I don't get my information from the New York Times. I get it from, um, the primary scientific literature, where I've been reading consistently for 30 years on topics about energy and the environment.

If you find that "detestable," well that speaks for both of us, doesn't it?

Have a nice Earth Day.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT: How Earth Day started, its profound radical message [View all] DBoon Apr 2020 OP

The First Earth Day, 1970 bucolic_frolic Apr 2020 #1

The NY Times features some of the worst environmental reporting in the world. NNadir Apr 2020 #2

You are absolutely detestable DBoon Apr 2020 #3

Thank you. I'm very proud of looking at data and not marketing. NNadir Apr 2020 #4