Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CatLady78

(1,041 posts)
6. I have wondered about this
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 05:16 AM
Jun 2020

How is it that it has only been in the last 5-10 years maybe that I have seen environmental issues start getting factored into economic models? They generally parrot that crap-austerity for the poor, cut taxes on the wealthy etc over and over.

How can something that is supposed to be a science ignore how finite our resources are and how they are subject to natural laws that should be factored into any realistic model?

They should fund interdisciplinary areas where some of these social sciences (especially these hideously right shifted ones like economics) have more of a conversation with people with training in the natural sciences.


Look at psychiatry for instance. It will almost certainly become a more accurate science if they implement stuff like computational psychiatry properly (without falling prey to the biases inherent in ai right now). Surely economics is another softer science that needs a serious overhaul.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Dismal Science On Cli...»Reply #6