Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)

8. This was suspected, feedbacks, and all.

Reply to xchrom (Original post)

Sat May 5, 2012, 09:51 PM

May 2012

Of course, what I find most interesting about deniers (not skeptics, they twist that word so much it is rendered meaningless), is that they put so much faith in really old and inaccurate (ie, not refined) data.

Every fucking one of them despises the instrument temperature record, it has to be something else.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ice age study delivers blow to global-warming skeptics [View all] xchrom May 2012 OP

But, but, but...... sellitman May 2012 #1

And the moon is a light source! rfranklin May 2012 #2

How much more "proof" is needed? raouldukelives May 2012 #3

See? SEE??? It's just a cycle. Happens all the time. kestrel91316 May 2012 #4

You probably don't need the sarcasm thingy pscot May 2012 #5

True. Just playing it safe. kestrel91316 May 2012 #7

Even without evidence such as this, the CO2 levels lagging behind temperature change... eqfan592 May 2012 #6

This was suspected, feedbacks, and all. joshcryer May 2012 #8