Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,705 posts)
4. Two answers
Mon May 7, 2012, 02:41 PM
May 2012
1) Who ultimately receives the money collected as a surcharge? The government collects it and then disburses it to those that are installing the renewable energy systems, correct?

Incorrect. The utilities collect it from the consumers of electricity and keep it to offset their own costs.

2) With your unrelenting criticism of the nation that is most successful at GHG reductions, you seem to be of the opinion that we should continue business as usual.

I'm actually of the opinion that you should return to reality to visit once in awhile.

Germany was the most successful at GHG reductions when they were expanding renewables and relying on existing nuclear power... and I had no "unrelenting criticism" of them at the time. Currently they are not the most successful at GHG reductions... in fact their power generation sector is only increasing their GHG emissions and they'll spend the next couple decades struggling to tread water (spending hundreds of billions of euros that could have gone to actual GHG reductions). That's when my criticism began.

Coincidentally, it's your plaudits that have come fast and furious as their GHG emissions (from generation) climb. and their economy suffers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Another Considerable Rise...»Reply #4