Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
8. I do if there are alternatives.
Wed May 9, 2012, 05:49 PM
May 2012

I will admit, PV systems are a better deal this year than they were even this time last year, but at higher latitudes, you're behind the curve. You can even see it within Germany itself, when you look at a map of PV installation densities. Roughly eyeballing it, the lower 20% of the nation hosts half of the PV installations. (and if you look at wind generator installations, the opposite is true)

It's like a rocket launch site. You COULD put it anywhere, but at the equator, you get the most bang for your buck, and that counts for a lot.

Despite massive subsidy, it seems obvious that wind is the better choice for Germany, and explains why wind accounts for 8% of their total electrical generation per year, to solar's 3%.

I don't begrudge them some diversity in generating sources, that's a good idea I guess, but damn, it doesn't seem like the best idea, given their resources.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»German solar juggernaut r...»Reply #8