Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
8. Yes,by you. All of that can be laid at the feet of multiple meltdowns of nuclear reactors.
Fri May 11, 2012, 03:18 PM
May 2012

All of it. Your reasoning perfectly matches that of the fossil fuel industry. They also feel that turning off the "existing and undamaged source(s) of power generation" provided by their industry is irrational paranoia. Similar to you they believe that they should be the only arbiters of what society writ large should deem risky. Just like you they do not want to take responsibility for the cascade of economic consequences that result from failures of their technology. And just like the fossil fuel industry, the nuclear industry is motivated to their position on risk purely through selfish profit motives.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Inventor promotes low-pow...»Reply #8