dose-threshold analysis indicated no threshold - zero dose the best estimate of threshold

[kristopher]

8. Interesting how you cover your ass with that schizophrenic post.

Impact factor isn't a rating of the quality of a journal unless it is looked at in light of how large the specific field of research is that a given article relates to; and how broad the range of articles the publication handles.

Since the "impact factor" only rates citations, it cannot be used to draw a legitimate comparison between a journal dedicated to a very narrow field of research and a journal that is dedicated to a broad range of research interests.

You are starting to remind me of that old joke, "How do you know a lawyer is lying?"

The paper in the OP is questioned by no one except wild eyed nuclear supporters trying to stir up crap. It's antecedents are impeccable.