Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,819 posts)
1. American Nuclear Society says it's not Project Pele.
Mon Oct 25, 2021, 03:07 PM
Oct 2021
-- snip --

It’s not Project Pele: As a request for information issued by the Defense Logistics Agency Energy on behalf of the Air Force in September 2020 explained, "The Department of Defense is interested in two different concepts, and, therefore, it is important to distinguish between two distinct microreactor technology applications: fixed-site and mobile. While the DOD Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) is investigating the feasibility of mobile microreactors [through Project Pele] . . . the AF, through this RFI, is focused on the use of fixed-site applications of microreactors. The AF and the SCO will share insight gained from these initiatives, but these efforts will remain independent of each other, and there is no plan to combine efforts. The AF’s energy vision is to enhance mission assurance through energy assurance."

-- more --

https://www.ans.org/news/article-3367/microreactor-planned-for-us-air-force-base-in-alaska/


Project Pele is a mobile nuclear reactor in a shipping crate... which sounds crazy to me.

The current coal fired plant at Eielson Air Force Base has a nameplate capacity of 25 megawatts. This proposal is for a 1-5 megawatt reactor.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»This Alaskan Air Base Wil...»Reply #1