Environment & Energy

PamW

(1,825 posts)

9. Kris shows again he is NOT a SCIENTIST

Tue May 15, 2012, 11:15 PM

May 2012

Kris,

You have just shown again that you are not a scientist; because you don't know the ordering of the esteem to which journals are held.

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science is THE most prestigious scientific journal in the USA.

What you are saying is akin to saying, "This order came from a lieutenant, but that one came from only an admiral" I consider this lieutenant's order to be much higher priority than that other order which only came from an admiral.

Keep going Kris - do post more. My scientist colleagues are LAUGHING themselves SICK at your failed attempts to be scientific.'

Why don't you give up attempting to be scientific, and stick with what you know; which is......????

PamW

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

dose-threshold analysis indicated no threshold - zero dose the best estimate of threshold [View all] kristopher May 2012 OP

So this backs up the standard assumptions used for decades in radiation protection policymaking caraher May 2012 #1

Typo? kristopher May 2012 #2

Threshold Effect HAS been found!! PamW May 2012 #3

Wrong way "Pam" strikes again - misrepresenting research. kristopher May 2012 #4

BALONEY!!! PamW May 2012 #5

Wrong way "Pam" strikes again - yet again misrepresenting research. kristopher May 2012 #6

You DO understand that a higher impact factor is better than a low one, right? FBaggins May 2012 #7

Interesting how you cover your ass with that schizophrenic post. kristopher May 2012 #8

Kris shows again he is NOT a SCIENTIST PamW May 2012 #9

Wrong way "Pam" with more misdirection (and evidence of his style of "science") kristopher May 2012 #10