Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(16,881 posts)

16. That too.

Tue Nov 9, 2021, 06:27 AM

Nov 2021

But fossil hydrocarbons would be better used for other, more sophisticated, purposes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Coal keeps lights on at COP26 as low wind strikes again [View all] NNadir Nov 2021 OP

Redundant systems require two sets of O&M fixed costs. NNadir Nov 2021 #2

You and I define "good" differently. NNadir Nov 2021 #6

High prices will just be another nail in the coffin Finishline42 Nov 2021 #4

Notwithstanding the above discussion, Scotland's Ghost Dog Nov 2021 #9

RE: England going nuclear Finishline42 Nov 2021 #10

Yes. For this reason I recommend developing small nuclear Ghost Dog Nov 2021 #12

But what will it cost? Finishline42 Nov 2021 #14

See Rolls-Royce: Ghost Dog Nov 2021 #15

From your linked article Finishline42 Nov 2021 #17

That too. Ghost Dog Nov 2021 #16