Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: "How did we get a host?" a locked thread asks? Here is the answer. [View all]XemaSab
(60,212 posts)68. Sorry if my response to you came off as rude, that wasn't my intent
This forum meets the administration's definition of "Plays host to open debate". The E&E forum is quite contentious and participants are often rude. Presumably, the fair minded hosts are responsible to wade into the arguments and maintain civility. That's a tall task.
Group Hosts have the following abilities in their assigned groups:
Lock thread (Reason: Violates this forum's Statement of Purpose)
Locks a thread when the OP is not on-topic for the group. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP explaining why the thread was locked. The thread can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.
Lock thread (Reason not specified)
Locks a thread for an unspecified reason. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP, but no reason for the lock will be provided. The thread can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.
Pin & lock thread
Pins a thread to the top of the group and simultaneously locks it. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP, but no reason for the lock will be provided. The thread can be unpinned by any Host, but can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.
Pin thread
Pins a thread to the top of the group, where it will remain until it is unpinned. The thread can be unpinned by any Host.
Block a member from the group
Blocks a member from posting in the group. The member will be automatically notified by DU Mail. Members can be unblocked by any Host.
Make a member a Host of the group
Creates a new group Host. The selected member will be automatically notified by DU Mail. Members can only be removed as a Host by Hosts who are listed above them in the hierarchy.
Remove a Host of the group
Removes a Host. Hosts can only remove Hosts who are listed below them in the hierarchy
So far I have locked three threads that were off topic, and I have made five people my co-hosts. I understand that the discussion here is often contentious and rude. Without that it would not be the E/E we know and love. If people want to have flamewars, god bless 'em.
The pronuclear temporary hosts that are on the list don't have my approval. I don't want them arbitrating my discussions. I have read their material for years on this forum. The standard should be quite high for someone to be the forum host. We cannot all perform at the standards of Gandhi, of course, and I am not claiming that I am. However, at the moment, the selection is way off.
You are advocating a purity test here. You say that the existing people do not meet with your approval because *I* am supposedly pronuclear.
I object to how this process was rammed through so quickly. I have a job, I have other responsibilities, I have been going about my business and learning DU3. I returned to this forum to find that "hosts" have been selected before I even knew that E&E was going to have hosts.
I volunteered to be the host because I am here a lot, and so far it's been very time consuming. Since becoming the host, I have read every post in every thread. Why have I taken this upon myself? Because I want to be fair.
Put the hosts on hold for now and let E&E return to control by the moderators. Thank you.
There are no moderators. There are the hosts, and there are juries. If you see a post that violates the statement of purpose or the community standards, please hit the "Alert Abuse" button.
Group Hosts have the following abilities in their assigned groups:
Lock thread (Reason: Violates this forum's Statement of Purpose)
Locks a thread when the OP is not on-topic for the group. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP explaining why the thread was locked. The thread can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.
Lock thread (Reason not specified)
Locks a thread for an unspecified reason. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP, but no reason for the lock will be provided. The thread can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.
Pin & lock thread
Pins a thread to the top of the group and simultaneously locks it. An automatic notification will be dropped into the OP, but no reason for the lock will be provided. The thread can be unpinned by any Host, but can only be unlocked by the Host who locked it.
Pin thread
Pins a thread to the top of the group, where it will remain until it is unpinned. The thread can be unpinned by any Host.
Block a member from the group
Blocks a member from posting in the group. The member will be automatically notified by DU Mail. Members can be unblocked by any Host.
Make a member a Host of the group
Creates a new group Host. The selected member will be automatically notified by DU Mail. Members can only be removed as a Host by Hosts who are listed above them in the hierarchy.
Remove a Host of the group
Removes a Host. Hosts can only remove Hosts who are listed below them in the hierarchy
So far I have locked three threads that were off topic, and I have made five people my co-hosts. I understand that the discussion here is often contentious and rude. Without that it would not be the E/E we know and love. If people want to have flamewars, god bless 'em.
The pronuclear temporary hosts that are on the list don't have my approval. I don't want them arbitrating my discussions. I have read their material for years on this forum. The standard should be quite high for someone to be the forum host. We cannot all perform at the standards of Gandhi, of course, and I am not claiming that I am. However, at the moment, the selection is way off.
You are advocating a purity test here. You say that the existing people do not meet with your approval because *I* am supposedly pronuclear.
I object to how this process was rammed through so quickly. I have a job, I have other responsibilities, I have been going about my business and learning DU3. I returned to this forum to find that "hosts" have been selected before I even knew that E&E was going to have hosts.
I volunteered to be the host because I am here a lot, and so far it's been very time consuming. Since becoming the host, I have read every post in every thread. Why have I taken this upon myself? Because I want to be fair.
Put the hosts on hold for now and let E&E return to control by the moderators. Thank you.
There are no moderators. There are the hosts, and there are juries. If you see a post that violates the statement of purpose or the community standards, please hit the "Alert Abuse" button.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"How did we get a host?" a locked thread asks? Here is the answer. [View all]
kristopher
Dec 2011
OP
Please clarify a couple of your views; when asked earlier you sidstepped the questions.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#28
So she didn't tell Skinner there was an ongoing discussion because I too volunteered to be host?
kristopher
Dec 2011
#8
Do you understand that this thread has nothing to do with the scientific value of Jacobson's paper?
GliderGuider
Dec 2011
#32
I was about ready to swallow that emotional maturity argument and then I saw JPak as a host.
Massacure
Dec 2011
#19
In my defense - I usually respond to vicious over-the-top personal attacks with real laughter
jpak
Dec 2011
#30
He's trying hard to get the thread locked and (he hopes) himself blocked as disruptive.
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#153
I knew from the beginning E/E would face the most contentious discussion re hosts ...
eppur_se_muova
Dec 2011
#37
This "host selection" has been exactly contrary to the stated process in the DU3-Announcements-forum
Kolesar
Dec 2011
#61
"The pronuclear temporary hosts that are on the list don't have my approval" makes that pretty clear
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#66
"This one has been cleared by Skinner as a re-visit of "Do we need hosts?" = BS
kristopher
Dec 2011
#85
I think it is blatantly obvious to every reader of this thread exactly who is being "self serving".
Nihil
Dec 2011
#101
In other words you do not have a reason to oppose splitting EE into two groups.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#127
And you insist that your interpretation of what "the science" says is the correct one.
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#136
You said "the guy has a right to exist." Who is denying him that even with his disruptive behavior?
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#98
What you thought has absolutely nothing to do with the question asked of Xemasab.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#86
You obviously think that a discussion is "ongoing" until you get what you want.
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#99
And you obviously think that stealing the postion of host is a legitimate act.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#103
Groups can have from 0 to 20 hosts. I have a simple solution to resolve this thread.
freshwest
Dec 2011
#130