Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CrispyQ

(40,867 posts)
6. Why would such an inherently unsafe technology and unstable design...
Sat May 19, 2012, 12:17 PM
May 2012

...be implemented worldwide in the first place?"

Profit & greed.

The upshot of each of these articles is that the Pacific Ocean is extremely vulnerable to the radioactive waste being dumped into her waters at Fukushima. Should another catastrophic earthquake occur, it could create a new and more complicated nuclear disaster scenario that is truly irreparable. Even without any seismic activity affecting the nuclear sites, the current state of affairs has taken for granted that the Pacific Ocean will become a nuclear dumping ground for decades to come. It has not been lost on us that such an inevitability appears to be the only practical expedient available.


I think the situation is critical, however I don't have much hope that there will be an international response unless things get drastically worse. Putting together an international team would mean that other countries would also have to admit the dangers of nuclear power & then citizens might possibly demand that their nukes be turned off too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Pacific Ocean is Dyin...»Reply #6