Environment & Energy

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)

2. Even if everything you say were correct (it isn't)... he still needed to go.

Mon May 21, 2012, 10:35 AM

May 2012

You must admit that it's possible for a supervisor to be 100% correct in all of his professional decisions, but still be an unacceptable person to fill a role. Abuse of subordinates, dishonesty, harassment, abuse of power (that he didn't have), etc... are all reasons to go.

Again, the IG was reportedly almost done with another report on his "leadership" (sic). It's doubtful that it had anything to do with whether he was more "pro-safety" than other commissioners. Do you really think it's a coincidence?

But Hey! Just think of the mint he's going to make when he turns "whistleblower"!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jaczko Resigns! [View all] FBaggins May 2012 OP

Yeah what a bastard. kristopher May 2012 #1

Even if everything you say were correct (it isn't)... he still needed to go. FBaggins May 2012 #2

Like I said... kristopher May 2012 #3

And you were wrong. FBaggins May 2012 #4

The Republicans won. "We’ve tried to screw this guy three different times and failed" bananas May 2012 #5

So did the rest of us. FBaggins May 2012 #6

Looks like the GOP got what they wanted, although this article tells a different tale: freshwest May 2012 #9

The NRC is now required to be 110% for industry profits. kristopher May 2012 #11

The NRC deserves better than Jaczko!! PamW May 2012 #7

I agree that the NRC shouldn't be a political football caraher May 2012 #8

If memory serves.. PamW May 2012 #10