Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)

7. I am pretty sure I have read a rebuttal against that, but I can't remember what it is.

Reply to kristopher (Reply #3)

Mon May 21, 2012, 11:40 AM

May 2012

What do pro-nuke folks usually say to you when you mention green energy? Inefficacy? Too much land?

I can't remember. We need a pro-nuke person to come and speak for him/herself. I don't want to build strawmen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What could possibly go wrong? [View all] kristopher May 2012 OP

In the reality of today how anyone can still see nuclear as safe and sane is beyond my comprehension madokie May 2012 #1

They probably see it as safer than other alternatives. ZombieHorde May 2012 #2

Solar wind wave tidal and geothermal don't. kristopher May 2012 #3

But thats all the pro-nuclear folks have madokie May 2012 #5

Please don't think that anyone who says that is automatically pronuclear. kristopher May 2012 #6

I am pretty sure I have read a rebuttal against that, but I can't remember what it is. ZombieHorde May 2012 #7

It is a claim made without the support of analysis. kristopher May 2012 #8

I am one of the eeeeebil so-called pro-nukes. XemaSab May 2012 #9

but that is a whole different ball game madokie May 2012 #4