Environment & Energy

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)

4. And you were wrong.

Mon May 21, 2012, 01:51 PM

May 2012

Anyone appointed to serve at the pleasure of the President has a basic duty to do so in an honorable way.

He failed and it justifiably cost him his job.

It's dishonest to attempt to spin his ouster as an industry effort to get rid of him. To the extent it was anything like that, he was the one stupid enough to load the gun and give them the trigger. Surely we can find someone who will protect and serve the public and also not embarrass the President and party?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jaczko Resigns! [View all] FBaggins May 2012 OP

Yeah what a bastard. kristopher May 2012 #1

Even if everything you say were correct (it isn't)... he still needed to go. FBaggins May 2012 #2

Like I said... kristopher May 2012 #3

And you were wrong. FBaggins May 2012 #4

The Republicans won. "We’ve tried to screw this guy three different times and failed" bananas May 2012 #5

So did the rest of us. FBaggins May 2012 #6

Looks like the GOP got what they wanted, although this article tells a different tale: freshwest May 2012 #9

The NRC is now required to be 110% for industry profits. kristopher May 2012 #11

The NRC deserves better than Jaczko!! PamW May 2012 #7

I agree that the NRC shouldn't be a political football caraher May 2012 #8

If memory serves.. PamW May 2012 #10