Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)
4. I suspect we agree on that.
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:49 PM
May 2012

But we both know it's going to happen for the forseable future.

My position is that one way to get others on our side is to start have the environmental impact of our consumption be more evident. Instead of oil coming from the middle east (and the environmental impact of drilling, etc. staying there), get it here. Just look at the attention that the BP spill got (unfortunately not lasting). I think that people will be more likely to support working toward a cleaner world if the impact of their decisions is more evident.

And, for a bonus, the dollars and jobs are here rather than somewhere in the Middle East where someone's kid eventually has to go die.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Study suggests shale-gas ...»Reply #4