Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

localroger

(3,782 posts)
16. I see you missed the part where I work in industry with high technology
Tue Jul 19, 2022, 05:48 PM
Jul 2022

I supply, maintain, and calibrate industrial instrumentation. Even nuclear power plants once in awhile. My work takes me into nearly every industry and requires me to work with everyone from operators to senior engineers. I have spent nearly forty years watching these industries cut corners, ignore needed maintenance, and flaunt their own guidelines when it suits them. You are asking me to trust people I know from nearly forty years of experience can't be trusted.

Nuclear power is not going to save our civilization. If we decided it was totally safe yesterday, made a commitment to spend every
spare dime building reactors today, and started construction tomorrow, and had no accidents or failures ever, there simply isn't time.

And historically, nothing about nuclear energy has ever worked out as promised. Remember when it was going to be "too cheap to meter?" Frankly it is a distraction we can't afford at this point. There are reasons nuclear never became more pervasive, and those reasons aren't just ignorance. At this point I see no point in arguing further and will just state that I understand your argument and disagree, and I understand you disagree with me. Let's leave it there.

And if you do believe in your argument -- let me put this delicately -- you might want to consider being less of an asshole about it in future discussions. Insulting people you disagree with does not further your case.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Carry on cbabe Jul 2022 #1
Upton Sinclair stated it so well: ZZenith Jul 2022 #2
An apt criticism of natural gas dependent "renewable energy" schemes, perhaps? hunter Jul 2022 #5
Exactly equivalent. Carrying on about Fukushima in particular is abysmally stupid... NNadir Jul 2022 #3
Well allow me to be the first localroger Jul 2022 #8
I have no use, zero, for carrying on about Three Mile Island, nor do I have any use for doing... NNadir Jul 2022 #10
I do not have an "absurd fear" of radioactive materials. I have respect for them. localroger Jul 2022 #12
So your Dad was a scientist? You did a high school project?. NNadir Jul 2022 #15
I see you missed the part where I work in industry with high technology localroger Jul 2022 #16
I'm responsible for buying millions of dollars of high tech equipment. NNadir Jul 2022 #17
You see only what you want to see, and hear only what you want to hear localroger Jul 2022 #18
Is world total turbine capacity a small multiple of the Danish figure? 4dog Jul 2022 #4
It doesn't take too much spreadsheet work to estimate an answer to your question. NNadir Jul 2022 #7
Accidents are bad, but they are not the deal-killer with nuclear localroger Jul 2022 #6
Actually, the deal killer of "waste" should apply to dangerous fossil fuels, not used nuclear fuel. NNadir Jul 2022 #9
Excuse me but you do not seem to know what you are talking about localroger Jul 2022 #11
Really? I'm getting a lecture on nuclear fuels and fission physics? NNadir Jul 2022 #13
Well if you think I'm ignorant... localroger Jul 2022 #14
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A Commentary on Failure, ...»Reply #16