Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,503 posts)
20. I didn't need an an anthropomorphic child. I had younger siblings.
Mon May 21, 2012, 06:17 PM
May 2012

Changing diapers when you are ten makes a big impression.

Maybe we ought to be putting fourth graders to work taking care of infants and teaching them about birth control at the same time.

My parents didn't reject Genesis 9 : 7* until there was a mob of us, but once they did none of us, not any of our friends, not any neighborhood kid got past them without learning about birth control.

*And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Religion dimbear May 2012 #1
Absolutely get the red out May 2012 #3
We need to find ways to raise consciousness of this issue. Real programs and ideas. Gregorian May 2012 #2
I didn't need an an anthropomorphic child. I had younger siblings. hunter May 2012 #20
I'd like to say religion but I know many young people who are not into religion but having kids. freshwest May 2012 #4
I grew up in an intelligent neighborhood. Almost none of my friends has children. Gregorian May 2012 #5
They're quite intelligent, and believe me, I've lived areas I wouldn't say that about. I don't know freshwest May 2012 #6
There are different kinds of intelligence. Gregorian May 2012 #8
I think there's something inherently optimistic in all life XemaSab May 2012 #7
Yes, but... GliderGuider May 2012 #9
Global fertility rate 2.46 / US 2.06 / Japan 1.21 / Libya 2.96 kristopher May 2012 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author GliderGuider May 2012 #11
Global population is rising linearly by 75 million people per year. GliderGuider May 2012 #12
That doesn't really help understand or solve the problem GG. kristopher May 2012 #15
We know the population is rising by 75 M/year. That's true too. GliderGuider May 2012 #17
If you'll notice the course described has nothing to do with what you're saying. kristopher May 2012 #18
You must have an allergy GliderGuider May 2012 #19
There was a thread on this topic a few weeks ago CrispyQ May 2012 #13
Why do people purposefully give the next 90+ years to their babies? stuntcat May 2012 #14
IMO we are into the beginning of the bottleneck. GliderGuider May 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Population Is Popping: Wh...»Reply #20