Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,446 posts)
4. Cost to whom?
Mon Sep 19, 2022, 08:06 AM
Sep 2022

A nuclear plant is a gift to future generations. Wind and solar junk are liabilities, because they'll all be landfill in about 25 years.

Among the more important liabilities of course, is climate change, since the solar and wind industry entrench the use of dangerous fossil fuels.

I fully realize that the goal of antinukes is to find every single specious grounds to attack the only form of low carbon, reliable energy and oppose anything that kicks the wind out of their sails, but basically the goal of the current crop of nuclear engineers is not to satisfy bourgeois bean counters but rather to save the world for future generations.

This proposal, should it pan out, will achieve very high mass efficiency, as well as land efficiency, something that is particularly abysmal for the fossil fuel dependent solar and wind scam.

Have a wonderful week.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Three DOE National Labs (...»Reply #4