Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
2. Take off the rose coloured glasses
Thu May 24, 2012, 07:37 AM
May 2012

Firstly this is about a proposed method to remedy the shortcomings of existing nuclear stations with some nuclear and a lot of wind.

Secondly, it does not mention the massive lead time for any new nuclear plant to come on line. Because of this there is difficulty in persuading private business to invest in nuclear - except by applying public subsidy.

Thirdly it ignores the savings that will be coming from the planned smart energy grids - the user end metering is already being tested and the high accuracy metering for supply elements is already being fitted. Apparently the National Grid at present has to depend on a 10 to 20% overcapacity because of losses and poor design of the network.

Fourthly, it ignores renewables other than wind because they tend to be distributed and current power supply models cannot easily factor those in.

The last 2 parts of this came up in discussion in a recent Siemens staff/management roadshow.

Fifthly it ignores load sharing - because, as yet, suitable storage facilities are very far from production - so that is a maybe, admittedly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»No alternative to nuclear...»Reply #2